GitLab AI Code Review: How to Review Merge Requests Locally with AI
Review GitLab merge requests with AI on your own machine: glab mr checkout, view and diff, a copy-ready review prompt for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex or Copilot CLI.
Most AI review guides assume GitHub. Teams on GitLab, especially those with private or sensitive code, often prefer not to send merge requests to another cloud service. The good news: glab gives a coding agent everything it needs in a few commands.
What you need
- The GitLab CLI
glab, authenticated withglab auth login. - A local clone of the project.
- One coding agent signed in on your machine (Claude Code, Cursor CLI, Codex CLI or Copilot CLI).
Step 1: Check out the merge request
Reading the full code, not only the patch, is what lets the agent find problems outside the diff.
glab mr checkout 123Step 2: Save the intent and the changes
The description tells the agent what the MR should do; --comments includes the existing discussion. --raw outputs an unmodified patch that tools can read.
glab mr view 123 --comments > /tmp/mr-123.md
glab mr diff 123 --raw > /tmp/mr-123.diffStep 3: Ask the agent for a review
Use the same prompt with any agent. Keep it read-only and ask for a fixed format.
Read /tmp/mr-123.md for the intent and discussion,
and /tmp/mr-123.diff for the changes.
Check that the code does what the description says.
For each changed function, read its callers and tests.
Report findings as: severity, file:line, problem, suggested fix.
Do not edit files.Example with Claude Code
claude "$(cat review-prompt.txt)"Step 4: Post only what you agree with
Read the findings, drop the false positives and post the useful ones yourself, for example with glab mr note. The agent assists; the reviewer decides.
glab mr note 123 -m "The new endpoint does not check project membership."Where the manual flow gets slow
- Checkout, diff, prompt and cleanup repeat for every merge request.
- No history: findings disappear with the terminal session.
- Subgroups and self-managed instances need extra
--repoand host setup.
How CodeCrab automates it
CodeCrab connects your gitlab.com projects (including subgroups) through glab, prepares each merge request in an isolated copy, runs the review with your agent and repository skills, and keeps every finding and investigation on your laptop. Follow the GitLab merge requests guide to set it up, or see pre-push code review to catch issues before the MR exists.
Try it on your next Pull Request
Free Public Beta — runs 100% on your machine. No code leaving your laptop.
Download CodeCrabKEEP READING
GitHub Copilot Code Review: How It Works, Custom Instructions and Local Reviews
How GitHub Copilot code review works on Pull Requests, how to customize it with copilot-instructions.md, and how to review your branch locally with Copilot CLI before pushing.
How to Use Cursor for Code Review: Review Rules, Diff Checks and PR Workflows
Use Cursor for code review: review your branch before pushing, review PRs with the GitHub CLI, use Bugbot, and add a copy-ready .cursor/rules code review rule.
Can Claude Code Review PRs? How to Review a Pull Request with Claude Code (Step by Step)
Yes, Claude Code can review Pull Requests. Learn three ways to review a PR with Claude Code: pre-push branch reviews, GitHub CLI PR reviews and repeatable claude -p reviews, with copy-ready prompts.
The AI-Era Code Review Checklist: How to Review AI-Generated Code (and Vibe-Coded PRs)
A practical code review checklist for AI-generated code: verify authorization, API contracts, data integrity and tests, with copy-ready review templates and a repository-aware prompt.
Cursor Bugbot vs Codex vs Claude Code: Which AI Reviews Pull Requests Best?
Compare Cursor Bugbot, OpenAI Codex and Claude Code for PR and pre-push reviews: triggers, repository rules, permissions, privacy, practical prompts and a fair evaluation method.
Claude Code Subagents for Code Review: Security, Performance and Architecture Reviewers
Build three specialized Claude Code review subagents with copy-ready definitions: a security reviewer, a performance reviewer and an architecture reviewer, each with isolated context and read-only tools.
Best AI Code Review Tools in 2026: CodeRabbit vs Greptile vs Qodo vs Cursor Bugbot vs CodeCrab
A no-pricing comparison of the leading AI code review tools: where your code goes, what permissions you grant, how much context the reviewer sees, and when the review happens.
Claude Code Skills for Code Review: How to Create, Install and Activate Them
Create and install a custom Claude Code review skill with a copy-ready SKILL.md template. Learn local vs global paths, activation, troubleshooting, and the CodeCrab output format.
Local-First AI Code Review: Why Enterprise Codebases Can't Rely on Cloud Review Bots
Cloud review bots copy your diffs to vendor servers and ask for org-wide permissions. Here is how local AI code review and self-hosted PR review really differ, and what to verify before trusting either.
How to Review Code with Claude Code: From Generic Prompts to Repo-Aware Reviews
Claude Code can review Pull Requests, but generic prompts miss what matters. Learn how review skills, repository context and a fixed output format turn it into a real reviewer.
AI Can Write Your Code. But Who Reviews It? The New PR Bottleneck
AI made writing code cheap, but reviewing AI-generated code is now the bottleneck. Learn why PR queues grow, why rubber-stamping is risky, and how to review before the Pull Request.
Code review that fits your workflow: local skills and repository-aware agents
CodeCrab combines your existing local review skills with per-repository profiles and specialized agents, so you can review PRs and pre-push changes with the full codebase in context.
PR Code Reviews: how CodeCrab unblocks your team in the AI era
AI writes more code than ever, so review queues are the new bottleneck. Here is how CodeCrab reviews Pull Requests locally, with repo-specific skills and full engineer control.
My PRs — Feedback: turn vague review comments into a clear fix
Generic or unclear feedback on your Pull Request stalls you for days. CodeCrab investigates every comment with full local code context and hands you a ready-to-run fix prompt.
Pre-Push Code Review: catch bugs before the Pull Request even exists
The cheapest bug is the one that never reaches a PR. CodeCrab reviews your local changes with your repo's own profile and skills, so you push higher-quality code the first time.
